Search for: "Matter of Rogers (Bell)"
Results 81 - 100
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/5M6DCpSHNj -> Rogers violated false-advertising rules with 'fewest dropped-call' claims, court hears http://t.co/wM483GBTRN -> Blogged, Privacy Commissioners speak about Getting Accountability Right at CLHIA Conference – http://t.co/numJIzjPnt -> Privacy Commissioners speak about Getting Accountability Right at CLHIA Conference: Last week I had the pleasu… http://t.co/SxZWVQNyMV -> RT @copyrightgirl: Fascinating! [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm
Rogers, 75 M0. 441, 1882 WL 9621 at *4 (Mo. 1882)). [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
Considerable research and knowledge have resulted since Darwin's monumental pronouncements, yet many matters remain unresolved. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:34 am
Maks Del Mar, Department of Law, Queen Mary, University of London, and Convenor of the UK IVR 10am – 11am: Keynote, ArtsTwo Lecture Theatre Chair: Professor Roger Cotterrell, Department of Law, Queen Mary, University of London Professor Quentin Skinner, The Concept of the State in Legal History and Theory 11am – 11.30am: Tea and Coffee, ArtsTwo (outside Lecture Theatre) 11.30am – 1.pm: Open Paper Session I, Lecture Theatre and Breakout… [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:48 pm
Maybe Bell and Rogers will stand up and fight to win if and when their time comes around again and material is inadequate, as Shaw and Telus did earlier in 2004 and 2005. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:43 pm
With respect to recent and ongoing matters, the Interim Commissioner generally re-iterated stepped-up enforcement at the Bureau (referring to a “commitment to the vigorous enforcement of the Act”). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:36 am
(“Rogers/Bell/TELUS”). [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:18 pm
Other matters should be also made clear. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm
That’s what Shaw and Telus did vigorously and successfully did in 2004, with Bell and Rogers onside if not quite as actively. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 6:43 am
Canada and Bell Mobility Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:24 pm
According to media reports, Enbridge has removed the challenged imagery from one of its videos and taken steps to make associated disclaimers more prominent (disclaimers being another area of increasing challenge by the Bureau, including in the recent and ongoing Bell, Yellow Page Marketing and Rogers cases). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:32 pm
A Few Other Recent High-profile Cases The Rogers case is the most recent in a series of high-profile Canadian misleading advertising cases over the past several years that have included: Bell. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
Bell Canada, 2012 SCC 36; Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
Bell Canada). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Bell, 649 N.W. 2d 243, 252 (2002) (citing N.D. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:40 am
Kay Bell has more. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:24 pm
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown issued a concurrence railing against post-New Deal progress and economic regulation that Media Matters’ David Lyle calls “a sweeping radical libertarian manifesto” and Jonathan Turley calls “less dicta than diatribe. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:45 am
Roger Baker, from HMIC, first provided this updated figure to the inquiry last week. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 9:18 am
Thomson Rogers: Your advantage, in or out of the courtroom. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
