Search for: "May v. Austin" Results 81 - 100 of 2,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Tobias Lutzi
The Supreme Court can, like previously the House of Lords, depart from precedent in line with the Practice Statement [1966] 1 WLR 1234 (see Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28, at [25]), but the Supreme Court is very hesitant to do so in order to maintain legal certainty and predictability. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Nevitt
Tuberville disagrees with the Pentagon’s reproductive health care access policy that was issued following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm by John Floyd
District Court Judge Lee Yeakel, who sat in Austin before his May 31, 2023 retirement. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Like Mallory, disgruntled current or former employees, plan members, or other opposing parties in disputes may choose to file their lawsuit in the state with the laws, rules, or precedent most favorable to their position even where the dispute does not arise out of events occurring in the chosen state. [read post]