Search for: "May v. Dept. of Human Resources" Results 81 - 100 of 132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
”[18] Taken together with the general lack of human infallibility, these facts should lower public confidence in the Canadian prosecutorial system because it may lead to an arbitrary and unchecked level of power for the individual prosecutor. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
”[18] Taken together with the general lack of human infallibility, these facts should lower public confidence in the Canadian prosecutorial system because it may lead to an arbitrary and unchecked level of power for the individual prosecutor. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am by Rob Robinson
WA Dept. of Corrections – How Much Document Searching Must Be Done? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Halse v Halse, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 850604 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In 2003, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs (84 EPD ¶41,391), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provision in subparagraph (C). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:10 am by Heidi Henson
In 2003, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provision in subparagraph (C). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Gentleman’s idea may have some merit. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:11 am
 Here is the entirety of the Court's analysis on the point: The EEOC and Perich also contend that our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:05 pm
 Here is the entirety of the Court's analysis on the point: The EEOC and Perich also contend that our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
While the regulations do not explicitly say that there may be only one extension for executors who are not abroad, they provide for only one automatic extension. [read post]