Search for: "May v. National Union Fire Insurance Co." Results 81 - 100 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2018, 4:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rather, Evanston deems reserve information presumably referenced in the redacted claim notes not relevant to resolve the issue of coverage and not discoverable, because “the establishment of a reserve may merely reflect a prudent insurer’s recognition of the risks of inherent litigation rather than an admission of coverage or liability … ” National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, the court held that a crime insurance policy did not provide coverage for unpaid fuel sales that were purportedly based upon fabricated letters of credit.[8] The insured, Tesoro, sold fuel to Enmex Corporation on credit. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:55 am by Mike Aylward
 As the Indiana Supreme Court explained in National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:08 pm by Robert J. McKennon
As a result, Hyundai sought a defense from its liability insurers under a comprehensive general liability policies (“CGL”) issued by National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh and American Home Assurance Co. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:04 am
The Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to further clarify when a labor union may charge non-union members for a share of the national union’s expenses — in this case, the cost of lawsuits that affect the union members’ rights generally, rather than the rights of local union members  (Locke v. [read post]
However, some of her decisions on the district court may be of particular interest to Lawfare readers, including opinions on executive power, immigration and the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. [read post]