Search for: "May v. Supreme Court of State of Colorado" Results 81 - 100 of 1,947
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Nine: Ten Arguments that Petitioners Haven’t Raised (or that Trump Only Invoked Late in the Game)
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm by Marty Lederman
 “Off-Ramp” Arguments that would result in reversal of the Supreme Court of Colorado without adjudicating Trump’s eligibility that Petitioners have not raised 8. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
  And in support of that proposition, Gorsuch cited two Supreme Court cases—Munro v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
  And in support of that proposition, Gorsuch cited two Supreme Court cases—Munro v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
:@WilliamBaude: Section Three Is Not A "Political Question"
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
Anderson litigation, both the Colorado District and the Colorado Supreme Court found Section Three to be justiciable and Trump has not pressed a political question argument in his Supreme Court merits briefs. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The U.S. is no Longer a "Mature Democracy": Implications for Trump's Ballot Eligibility
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Tomorrow the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
 To be sure, the Colorado Supreme Court has declared that Colorado law requires the Secretary of State to exclude Trump’s name from the presidential primary election ballot (though as I explained here, that’s not happening, either—it’s too late for that now). [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Tune into one of the most important arguments in decades: Trump v. Anderson
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am by Marcia Coyle
” Trump petitioned the Supreme Court after the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Section 3 applied to him, and that he had engaged in insurrection– the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
Case Establishing Strict New Jersey Test for Independent Contractor Status Finally ‎Resolved: January 2024 IC Legal News Update
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Larue v. [read post]
Independent Contractor Compliance Legal Blog - http://independentcontractorcompliance.com/
Explaining Donald Trump’s 14th Amendment case at the Supreme Court
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am by Scott Bomboy
Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Five: Trump’s Argument That He Did Not Engage in an Insurrection
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  Even the Colorado Supreme Court could not find evidence of any consensus view on what the term meant in 1868. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Untitled
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
  The privilege of membership in a party may be, as this Court said in Grovey v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Law and Media Round Up – 5 February 2024
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, the court heard the defendant’s application to strike out the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers Limited KB-2023-003818. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
On appeal to the Supreme Court, the Colorado voters in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection That Enforcing Section Three Would Be Too "Dangerous"
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am by Will Baude
  The Supreme Court's unanimous landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Trump himself made this Positions Clause argument before the Colorado Supreme Court, and he even prevailed on it in the Colorado district court. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] What If Trump v. Anderson Is Treated Like an Election Law Case?
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The original challenges, citing Section 3, were filed in state court. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Supreme Court to decide whether insurrection provision keeps Trump off ballot
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
Both Trump and the Colorado Republican Party came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to review the state supreme court’s ruling. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Prof. Marty Lederman (Georgetown) on Trump v. Anderson: "Two Important Things All the Parties Get Wrong, …"
2 Feb 2024, 8:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Colorado Also is Not (Yet) Exercising Its Authority Under Article I's "Electors" Clause One of Trump's arguments (see Part V of his brief) is that the Colorado Supreme Court violated the Electors Clause of the U.S. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Interim Post: Two Important Things All the Parties Get Wrong, and One Other Important Thing They Don’t Address
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
M'Clung v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Look Away: How the Supreme Court Could Set Aside Trump’s Disqualification for Insurrection under the Fourteenth Amendment
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am by Dean Falvy
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/