Search for: "McCartney v. McCartney"
Results 81 - 100
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
(The Seventh Circuit, in Gaiman v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:25 am
Regina (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice (JUSTICE and another intervening); In re MacDermott’s and McCartney’s Applications for Judicial Review (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 18; [2011] WLR (D) 155 “A miscarriage of justice, within the meaning of section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, occurred where a new fact so undermined the evidence against the defendant that no conviction could possibly be based upon it. [read post]
11 May 2011, 2:42 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal of Mr Adams and by a majority allowed the appeals of Mr MacDermott and Mr McCartney. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
The Supreme Court has announced that the judgments of R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; In the Matter of an Application by Eamonn MacDermott for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); and In the Matter of an Application by Raymond Pius McCartney for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 15 – 17 February 2011, and Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another, heard 21 -22 February… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi and others (Respondents) v The Security Service and others (Appellants), heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office (Appellant) v Tariq (Respondent), heard 24 –… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
Hughes v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
” In short, as summed up by the court in People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:45 pm
Using the immortal words of Paul McCartney John Lennon (oops!) [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
” In short, as summed up by the court in People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group… [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-18 November 2010 Baker… [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-18 November 2010 Baker… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:52 am
The leading case on the issue is the House of Lords judgment in the 2004 case of R v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
>> Paul McCartney pediu que o Google retirasse sua mansão, em St Johns Wood, no Norte de Londres, do sistema. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
Finally, Lauren V. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 10:13 am
Some believe this decision is contrary to the ECJ ruling in Copad SA v Dior (Case C-59/08, 23 April 2009), where a "trademark's prestige" and "the aura of luxury" were found to be "essential" to brand protection. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 10:13 am
Some believe this decision is contrary to the ECJ ruling in Copad SA v Dior (Case C-59/08, 23 April 2009), where a "trademark's prestige" and "the aura of luxury" were found to be "essential" to brand protection. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 4:08 pm
In this instance, fashion house Stella McCartney Ltd objected to a promotion run by SCA Hygiene Products UK Ltd -- the manufacturers of Bodyform sanitary towels -- in which SCA offered Stella McCartney underwear as a prize. [read post]
