Search for: "McCormick v. McCormick"
Results 81 - 100
of 586
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2022, 3:00 am
There’s been an almost non-stop flow of opinions from Chancellor McCormick relating to discovery disputes in Twitter v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:35 am
Chancellor Kathleen McCormick, the head of the Chancery Court, presides over the Twitter v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 3:37 pm
In Greer v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 7:51 am
Musk, August 23, 2022, McCormick, K.).Twitter suit to compel acquisition. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
The blog goes on to discuss the role that proper structuring & documentation of the board’s oversight of mission critical played in Chancellor McCormick’s dismissal of Caremark claims in City of Detroit Police & Fire Retirement System v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
On July 19, 2022, in the Twitter v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
In Totta v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
In Totta v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Twitter v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 7:59 am
Tri-State Pension Fund v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 3:57 am
McCormick v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:00 pm
In an Order handed down yesterday, June 27, 2022, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal from the Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision in the case of Rush v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:59 am
Citing extensively from and relying on McCormick v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 3:00 am
Earlier this month, I blogged about Chancellor McCormick’s decision in Coster v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:02 pm
McCormick filed suit following a ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on May 20 in Miglioi v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:53 am
Slip op. at ¶ 20 (citing McCormick v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:18 am
McCormick in SDF Funding LLC v Fry in which, after remarking that Section 327’s contemporaneous ownership requirement “is not universally beloved” and referring to VC Laster’s scholarship on the issue, she considered and ultimately rejected the argument of a putative derivative plaintiff who ran afoul of the rule, that he should be afforded “equitable standing” to prosecute the action. [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:21 am
So of course, after I drafted this post about Chancellor McCormick’s decision in Coster v. [read post]