Search for: "McCutcheon v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 7:42 am by Amy Howe
Federal Election Commission, holding that the government may not prohibit corporations or unions from spending money to support or denounce individual candidates in elections, and McCutcheon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Today at 10:30 a.m. the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:31 am by Richard Pildes
To make these issues concrete, let me start the discussion by grounding it in a recent high-profile case:  the Court’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:33 pm by George Ticoras, Esq.
Leahy argues in his press release, “The hearing comes on the heels of the Court’s McCutcheon v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 1:42 pm by Stefan Passantino
This rationale is noteworthy, of course, because the United States Supreme Court just announced in McCutcheon v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 10:39 am by Michael Beckett, Esq.
Aggregate contribution limits for individuals and PACs contributing to state candidates are no longer enforceable, according to the settlement reached in Young v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:48 am by Amy Howe
”  And Stevens echoed a point made by Justice Stephen Breyer in his dissent in McCutcheon v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:17 pm by Stefan Passantino
Our last post analyzed the clear implications of the US Supreme Court’s reasoning in McCutcheon v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am by Joe May
In an interview with The New York Times, Stevens talked about what he called a telling flaw in the opening sentence of the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]