Search for: "McDonald Investments Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 5:45 pm
This illness outbreak—at the time, the largest in U.S. history—would claim four young lives, leave many others with lifelong health impairments, sicken over 700 people, and nearly ruin Foodmaker Inc., the parent company of Jack in the Box. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:19 pm
Doing so would put 300,000 families a year into homes, generating 235,000 jobs and more than $4 billion in tax revenue, according to AmeriDream Inc., a Gaithersburg, Maryland-based nonprofit that provided down-payment assistance in the past and supports Green’s plan. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:00 pm
See Eighth Circuit on Target on Appeal; In re Sketcher’s USA Inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
& Anor v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi & Ors v The Security Service & Ors , heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office v Tariq, heard 24 – 27 January 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 6:07 am
Maria Glover (Georgetown University), on Wednesday, December 20, 2017 Tags: Class actions, Fraud-on-the-Market, Securities enforcement, Securities litigation, Supreme Court Meaningful Limits on Director Pay Posted by Dan Marcec, Equilar Inc., on Wednesday, December 20, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation disclosure, Director compensation, ISS, Proxy advisors, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting Passive… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
Enron – Denied 2-Mar McDonald v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 6:16 am
Peters, CFA Institute, on Monday, August 5, 2019 Tags: Disclosure, Earnings disclosure, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Incentives, Information environment, Investor protection, Reporting regulation, SEC, Securities regulation, Transparency A Roadmap for President Trump’s Crypto-Crackdown Posted by John Reed Stark, John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, on Tuesday, August 6, 2019 … [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:35 am
Investments, Inc., 998 F.2d 324 (5th Cir.1993). [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
This time, Darren hosts a post by Bernard McDonald, technical assisant at Gill, Jennings & Every, who reports on the issuance of the revised proposal.* Colourless Copaxone in the clear: Teva's synthesis patents held to be (mostly) validThe never-ending litigation between Synthon and Teva over Copaxone (glatiramer acetate) has already given us interesting and striking decisions from the Patents Court [also here], the Court of Appeal in… [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
If the public doesn’t think the system is fair, at a minimum, they are not going to invest their hard-earned money. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
James Allen, president of the New York Apple Association Inc., said this was the association’s first year as a contributor. [read post]
