Search for: "McFarlane v. McFarlane"
Results 81 - 100
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2024, 2:57 am
Case-notes DLA Piper has just published a series of notes on leading cases on religion/belief and employment law: Bailey v Stonewall Equality Ltd and Garden Court Chambers (2020) Fahmy v Arts Council England (2023) Furlong v The Chief Constable of Cheshire Police (2019) Grainger Plc and others v Nicholson (2010) Higgs v Farmor’s School (2023) Joanna Phoenix v Open University (2024) Ladele v London Borough of Islington (2009)… [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Court of Appeal hearing On 29 and 30 November 2016 the matter was heard before the Court of Appeal bench comprising of McFarlane, Davis, and Sharp LJJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Court of Appeal hearing On 29 and 30 November 2016 the matter was heard before the Court of Appeal bench comprising of McFarlane, Davis, and Sharp LJJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Court of Appeal hearing On 29 and 30 November 2016 the matter was heard before the Court of Appeal bench comprising of McFarlane, Davis, and Sharp LJJ. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:33 am
Particular reliance was placed upon the decision of the Court of Appeal in Durant v Financial Services Authority [2004] FSR 573. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am
This ruling represented arguably the most important family law case decided by the Supreme Court and the most significant judgment dealing with ancillary relief matters since Miller v Miller, McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 11:36 pm
Unfairness: Citing the judgment in Miller; McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, the wife contended that the agreement did not meet her needs and was inherently unfair. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
This post focuses mainly on the human rights issues, but the judgment of McFarlane LJ, described as “magisterial” by Sir James Munby, merits reading in full. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
The judge held that “whilst the current circumstances could not fail to engage both sympathy and concern for the parents” as a matter of legal policy (see McFarlane v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
Appreciate you are busy but it would be v helpful to have answers to qs about party status and existence/format of jmt. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm
This has been established law since the decision in Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878; [2007] 1 FLR. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
Let us go back to Laws LJ in McFarlane v Relate Avon : the conferment of any legal protection or preference upon a particular substantive moral position on the ground only that it is espoused by the adherents of a particular faith, however long its tradition, however rich its culture, is deeply unprincipled; it imposes compulsory law not to advance the general good on objective grounds, but to give effect to the force of subjective opinion. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am
Supreme Court decided Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
A notorious recent example was Lord Carey’s intervention in McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, an unfair dismissal claim brought by a relationship counselor who as a result of his Christian beliefs refused to promote gay sex. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
McFarlane, and the D.C. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 19 and 20 June 2018 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Mcfarlane and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
Perhaps also, we should reconsider the decentralization v centralization binary as a central concern for how local government actually operates. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 11 July 2019 Sir Andrew McFarlane handed down judgment in the case of R (TT) v Registrar General for England and Wales [2019] EWHC 1823 (Fam), the case concerning the identification of a transgender male who had given birth. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:40 pm
The most notorious example has been McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, an unfair dismissal claim brought by a relationship counselor who as a result of his Christian beliefs refused to promote gay sex. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
If the local authority’s treatment of the claimants was the result of their expressed antipathy to homosexuality, it would not be because of their religious beliefs (Ladele v Islington LBC (2009) EWCA Civ 1357). [read post]
