Search for: "McFarlane v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
With that in mind, a secular judge must be wary of straying across the well-recognised divide between church and state. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:27 am
A successful prosecution with the narrower continuation in the United States could then be used in the PPH. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:34 pm
McFarlane, 360 F.3d 644, 648 (7th Cir.2004); see Yankee Candle Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:09 pm
Clarke v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am
This ruling represented arguably the most important family law case decided by the Supreme Court and the most significant judgment dealing with ancillary relief matters since Miller v Miller, McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:00 pm
Comment McFarlane is the latest in a stream of decisions of the ECtHR holding Ireland in breach of Article 6 due to delays: McMullen v Ireland; Doran v Ireland; O’Reilly and Others v Ireland, and Barry v Ireland. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm
See Sibron v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:40 pm
The most notorious example has been McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, an unfair dismissal claim brought by a relationship counselor who as a result of his Christian beliefs refused to promote gay sex. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
A notorious recent example was Lord Carey’s intervention in McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, an unfair dismissal claim brought by a relationship counselor who as a result of his Christian beliefs refused to promote gay sex. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:50 pm
McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ B1 (29 April 2010) – Read judgment or our previous post Case comment Lord Carey of Clifton, responding to Lord Justice Laws’ observations in MacFarlane, has called this latest dust-up about religion in the courts a “deeply unedifying clash of rights“. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:59 am
The first rule of tax club Filed under: Bully State,WTF? [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:05 am
Rejecting that request, in McFarlane v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:43 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Appleby, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 926 (29 April 2010) Jones, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 925 (29 April 2010) Kazantzis, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 712 (16 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RW v SW [2010] EWCA Civ 457 (29 April 2010) Birmingham City Council v Clue [2010] EWCA Civ 460 (29 April 2010) McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ B1 (29 April 2010) Parker v Secretary of… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:54 am
Read more: More posts on religious discrimination Judgment in Mcfarlane v Relate Avon Ltd. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
The inquiry is always in two stages, namely computation and distribution;”iv) The House of Lords in White v White [2001] AC 596 and Miller v Miller and McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] 2 AC 618 has given guidance as to the approach and principles to be applied in the exercise of the statutory discretion conferred by the MCA 1973.v) That guidance makes it clear that the court is to have regard to, and apply, the relevant statutory provisions.vi)… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:15 am
In McFarlane v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:56 am
McFarlane (360 F.3d 644). [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 1:15 am
I thank Marilyn Stowe Family Law and Divorce Blog for her McFarlane v McFarlane: A Divorce SeesawIvana Trump said, famously: "Don't get mad. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 6:06 am
As McFarlane J.A. stated in Lutes, s. 2(c) "does not provide for the awarding of damages as between persons who are at fault. [read post]
