Search for: "McLean v. McLean" Results 81 - 100 of 347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2008, 2:38 am
UK Ltd & Anor [2008] EWHC 361 (Ch) (20 February 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Tamarevichute v Russian Federation [2008] EWHC 534 (Admin) (19 March 2008) McLean v The High Court of Dublin, Ireland [2008] EWHC 547 (Admin) (19 March 2008) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
This week's summaries concern: Admin law & requirement to give reasons / Québec rectification of contracts / Maritime law: McLean v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
Contents include:Alexandria J Nylen, Frontier justice: international law and ‘lawless’ spaces in the “War on Terror” Eglantine Staunton & Jason Ralph, The Responsibility to Protect norm cluster and the challenge of atrocity prevention: an analysis of the European Union’s strategy in Myanmar Lama Mourad & Kelsey P Norman, Transforming refugees into migrants: institutional change and the politics of international protection Klaus Dingwerth, Henning Schmidtke,… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Kirk Jenkins
 While we await the opinions, here’s a preview of the first case, Doe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Kirk Jenkins
 While we await the opinions, here’s a preview of the first case, Doe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 4:52 am
"My inquisitive correspondent found that McLean v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 12:34 pm by admin
Goss Power (Mitigation when contract includes a fixed period of notice to terminate) McLean v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:21 pm by Injury at Sea
Watchstanders at the Coast Guard Sector Juneau command center received a distress call from the passengers of the Velvet when their boat ran aground and began to take on water in Mclean Arm southeast of Prince of Wales Island. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:45 am by Liz Campbell
Nevertheless, in a subsequent Scottish case, Her Majesty’s Advocate v McLean, the High Court of Justiciary (sitting with a bench of seven judges) held that Articles 6(1) & 6(3)(c) were not violated by the reliance on admissions made by a detainee who did not have access to a solicitor. [read post]