Search for: "Michael Garcia v." Results 81 - 100 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
Franck Vecella described the benefits of the ITC even for SEPs, citing the Apple v Samsung dispute. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:01 am by cdw
From the current edition: Leading off this week is the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Michael Coleman v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:25 am by INFORRM
(a) Greig v Stirling & anr (b) Hamaizia & Anor v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (c)  Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited (d) Mionis v Democratic Press SA & Ors (12) Who is the odd one out? [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
(a) Greig v Stirling & anr (b) Hamaizia & Anor v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (c)  Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited (d) Mionis v Democratic Press SA & Ors (12) Who is the odd one out? [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm by firemarkVA
  ‘Innocence of Muslims’ Actress Scores Huge Victory at Appeals Court Cindy Lee Garcia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Department of Justice (June 16, 2023) Government motion for a protective order limiting the disclosure of discovery information (June 16, 2023) Garcia Hearings Paperless order granting in part Government motion for Garcia hearings regarding Nauta, De Oliveira and counsel (Sept. 25, 2025) Government reply in support of Garcia hearing regarding De Oliveira and counsel (Sept. 6, 2023) De Oliveira opposition to government motion for a Garcia hearing (Aug. 30, 2023)… [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:58 am
Swenson No. 94,207 Sedgwick County (PR)Michael P. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:51 am by Bexis
  Buckmanpreempted the exception (see Garcia v. [read post]