Search for: "Mike McKee"
Results 81 - 100
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 1:41 pm
Mike McKee's Recorder column on the recent decision in Nazir v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
This morning's Recorder has an article by Mike McKee on the opinion (subscription), which begins: It isn't a good sign when an appeal court refers to a lower court's "ruling" in quote marks as if it's not worthy of the term. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
Mike McKee has an article (subscription) in this morning's Recorder on the PAGA holding in Arias and Amalgamated, which is being hailed as "a victory for employees. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 3:44 pm
An article (subscription) by Mike McKee in yesterday's Recorder discussed this case in more detail. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 5:22 am
" And Mike McKee of The Recorder has an article headlined "All Parties Agree: This Ruling Stinks! [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:22 am
Supreme Court specialist Mike McKee's story is online. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:00 am
In an article in this morning's Recorder, Mike McKee writes: "Big Tobacco and other major businesses took a hit Monday when the California Supreme Court ruled that class actions over alleged fraud can go forward, even if it's impossible to tell whether every plaintiff was harmed by deceptive ads. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:42 am
Click here for today’s story, from the Recorder’s Mike McKee. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:37 pm
Mike McKee's report on today's argument in the Tobacco case is already up on The Recorder's website: Just a few weeks ago, the California Supreme Court ruled that lawsuits under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act can only be filed by individuals who suffer real damage from unlawful business practices. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 6:05 am
High Court Pat-Down Case May Get Punted": Today in The Recorder, Mike McKee has an article that begins, "Confronted with whether pat-down searches at professional football games violate individual privacy rights, the California Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed ready to punt the issue back to the trial courts. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 7:35 am
From an interesting story by Mike McKee of The Recorder:Any hope the California Supreme Court might resolve a politically sensitive... [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 4:28 pm
"Name-Brand Drug Makers Ruled Liable for Injuries From Other Manufacturers' Generics": Mike McKee of The Recorder provides this report. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 12:04 pm
This article by Mike McKee provides an answer from California's appellate judges, who also offer tips on what to do and not to do. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 12:30 am
Reporter Mike McKee's write-up of their responses describes some pitfalls for appellants' counsel to avoid and how the justices approach brief reading, among other things. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:42 pm
Mike McKee at the Recorder wrote an interesting article yesterday about the reply brief on appeal. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:45 am
A story in today’s San Francisco Recorder, “Appeal Courts Publishing More, Barely,” by Mike McKee, gauges the effects of a new court rule designed to encourage opinion publication by the California Court of Appeal and includes these statistics: . . . [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:24 pm
In the weeks leading up to today's historic ruling on gay marriage, Cal Law staffers Mike McKee and Pam Smith asked some of the key participants in the four-year court battle to reflect on the experience. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:10 am
Here's the whole 172-page package: opinion.pdf Mike McKee's first take on the story is live at Cal Law now (free reg. req'd). [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
Mike McKee, a reporter for the San Francisco Recorder once again underscores the hostility that California lawyers have against the current malpractice insurance disclosure proposal. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 9:30 am
In today's Recorder, Mike McKee reports that "Sixth District Lets Counties Pay on Contingency" (subscription): The ruling is great news for local governments, which claim they would have a hard time prosecuting nuisance abatement suits â€â [read post]
