Search for: "Miller UK, Ltd" Results 81 - 100 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the recovery of success fees, Mitting J accepted that there was a stark conflict between the ratio of House of Lords’ judgment in Campbell v MGN Ltd (No 2) [2005] UKHL 61 and MGN v UK, the ruling of the Strasbourg Court in the same case. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:37 am by Aidan Wills
On the recovery of success fees, Mr Justice Mitting accepted that there was a stark conflict between the ratio of House of Lords’ judgment in Campbell v MGN Ltd (No 2) [2005] UKHL 61 and MGN v UK, the ruling of the Strasbourg Court in the same case. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 16 January 2017, Sir David Eady heard the PTR and applications in the case of Todary v W1 Cars Ltd. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 24 January until Thursday 26 January, the Supreme Court will hear the appeals of Times Newspapers Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; and Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 12:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 6:10 am by Blog Editorial
If you would like to get in touch with the editors, please email them at: editors@ukscy.org.uk Edited by Dr Daniel Clarry and Christopher Sargeant Published by Appellate Press Ltd Available online at www.ukscy.org.ukAvailable online and in-store at Wildy & Sons Ltd [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Amoena (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 7 June 2016 Bailey & Anor v Angove’s PTY Ltd, heard 8 June 2016 R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 Hayward v Zurich Insurance Company plc, heard on 16 June 2016 Secretary of State for the Home Department v FV (Italy), heard on 21 June 2016 Hastings Borough Council v Manolete Partners plc, heard on 23 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  As the UK government has explained, DRIPA “makes clear that anyone providing a communications service to customers in the UK – regardless of where that service is provided from – should comply with lawful requests” for production.[17]  In other words, the UK’s laws compelling production turn not on the location of stored data, but on something more like the U.S. legal standard for asserting personal jurisdiction over the custodian… [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:51 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Jetivia SA & Anor v Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors, heard 14 October 2014. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:51 am by INFORRM
 After the managed litigation of the phone hacking claims was set up there have been some high public settlements: Jude Law settled his phone hacking claim for £130,000; Sienna Miller settled for £100,000; and Charlotte Church and her parents for £300,000. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors, heard 5 June 2014. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 1:01 am by Siobhan Hayes
This post was written by Siobhan Hayes, Catherine Johnson and Angela Gregson, with contributions from Marjorie Holmes and Edward Miller In the first case subjecting a permitted user clause in a lease to scrutiny under the Competition Act, a landlord local authority seeking to impose use restrictions on its tenant (to promote mixed use in a parade of shops) lost its case on the grounds that it would breach competition law by doing so and that it had not proven that the requirements for… [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
On the same day there was an application before Sir David Eady in the case of ReachLocal UK Ltd v Bennett. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:23 am by Ben
As the case before us illustrates, absent wholesale usurpation of another's expression, claims of copyright infringement where works of history are at issue are rarely successful.Of course Canada is a different jurisdiction from the UK and the USA. [read post]