Search for: "Million v. DHS" Results 81 - 100 of 225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm by Jaclyn Kelley-Widmer
DHS had argued that its action should be unreviewable under the “enforcement exception” created in Heckler v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am by Sarah Libowsky, Krista Oehlke
  On Biden’s first day in office, DHS announced that it would no longer place asylum seekers in the punitive program. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:40 pm by Matt Gluck
In the latest development in the Trump v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 5:53 pm by Shahid Buttar
Only two years ago, the Supreme Court held in Riley v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  In the event DHS conducts an enforcement action at a facility where a workplace claim has been filed or based upon information an employer provided to DHS in retaliation against noncitizen employees, DHS will allow any arrested or detained noncitizens to remain in the U.S. until after DHS notifies law enforcement and allows the enforcing agency the opportunity to conduct interviews of these noncitizens. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  In the event DHS conducts an enforcement action at a facility where a workplace claim has been filed or based upon information an employer provided to DHS in retaliation against noncitizen employees, DHS will allow any arrested or detained noncitizens to remain in the U.S. until after DHS notifies law enforcement and allows the enforcing agency the opportunity to conduct interviews of these noncitizens. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
More recent examples of prosecutorial discretion are the September 30, 2021 Memorandum of DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas (the policy Texas and Louisiana unsuccessfully sought to overturn in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:00 am by Lyle Denniston
That part of the program is the one affecting upwards of 4 million individuals. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 5:50 am by Josh Blackman
Br. 31-42) that DHS offered an inadequate explanation for its legal analysis. [read post]