Search for: "Modified Opinion filed 3/1/10" Results 81 - 100 of 728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
 Plans for the remodel were submitted to the City of Huntington Beach for approval:The first set depicted what amounted to a “substantial” remodel since it (1) improved the overall value of the property more than 50% and (2) modified more than 50% of the existing walls. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Blackstock, No. 05-7709 Dismissal of motion under 28 U.S.C. section 2255 as successive is vacated where: 1) the district court recharacterized a previous motion filed by defendant as a section 2255 motion without giving him the notice required by US v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am by Jessica Kroeze
It nevertheless filed auxiliary claim requests 1 to 11.VI. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
Yet Terri waited approximately two months after DCS filed the CHINS petitions before initiating any action to modify the parenting time. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Clark, a 10-page, 2-1 opinion, Judge Riley writes:Appellant-Respondent, Todd Allen Clark (Clark), appeals the trial court's Order denying his Verified Petition for Abatement and/or Modification of Child Support Order. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:06 pm by Michael
Under the conservatorship there are 10 rights that are subject to manipulation that would be 1)the right to determine the residence 2)the right to receive child support 3)the right to make invasive medical decisions for the child 4)the right to make psychological and or psychiatric decisions for the child 5)education decisions for the child 6)the right of agency to act as the child’s agent 7)the right to take legal action on behalf of the child 9)the right to manage… [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 10:52 am by Eugene Volokh
" To support that statement, footnote 1 cites the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:13 am
This post examines an opinion by a U.S.District Court Judge who sits in the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
He also criticized the defectiveness of the communication dated November 3, 2010.The applicant then filed an appeal as well as a modified sequence protocol. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion originally filed on September 8, and subsequently modified and certified for partial publication on October 4, 2023, the Sixth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment granting a writ setting aside Monterey County’s issuance of a permit to investor-owned public utility/water supplier California-American Water Company (“Cal-Am”) to construct a desalination plant and related facilities needed as one component of… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am by Carolina Attorneys
SKJONSBY Opinion of the Court – 3 – On December 14, 2017, Defendant filed a motion to modify custody. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:13 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In a communication pursuant to Article 15(1) RPBA the board set out its preliminary opinion that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request and new auxiliary requests 1 and 2 was excluded from patentability by virtue of Article 53(b) EPC as it constituted an essentially biological process for the production of plants and that claim 1 of new auxiliary requests 3 to 5 lacked clarity (Article 84 EPC).The board furthermore stated its… [read post]