Search for: "Moore v. District of Columbia" Results 81 - 100 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2017, 5:01 am by Leonard Jernigan
The 10th Circuit’s decision directly conflicts with a recent decision made by the District of Columbia  Circuit Court of Appeals, which means the U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:03 am by Stephen Wermiel
On November 29, during oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Saywell Colonial Justice: Justice, Morality and Crime in the Niagara District, 1791-1849 by David Murray Canadian State Trials Volume Two: Rebellion and Invasion in the Canadas, 1837-8 edited by F. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit--has gone on to also address the other half of the RFRA equation:  the D.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am by Maureen Johnston
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In Eldridge v British Columbia, the Court found that the failure of hospitals to provide sign-language services for hearing-impaired patients was a violation of section 15. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
SaywellColonial Justice: Justice, Morality and Crime in the Niagara District, 1791-1849 by David MurrayCanadian State Trials Volume Two: Rebellion and Invasion in the Canadas, 1837-8 edited by F. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:32 am
Forty-seven states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands have adopted the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA). [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
District Court for the District of Columbia’s opinion in Al Odah v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc,, 454 P.2d 244, 247 (Alaska 1969).ArizonaNo Arizona court has directly passed on innovator liability, but the federal district court in the Darvocetlitigation twice held that the theory was incompatible with Arizona law. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Crying foul, Ralls brought suit against CFIUS in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which last year dismissed the suit on jurisdictional grounds. [read post]