Search for: "Morales v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 4:47 pm
The Court (Los Angeles Superior, Judge White) granted the motion: First, the court concluded that the holding of Fitz-Gerald v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
In Mark v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:51 am
This post examines an opinion from the Superior Court of NewJersey – Appellate Division: State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:03 am
So it is that as recently as 1985 the Superior Court ruled that a parent’s homosexual relationship reflected a “moral deficiency” that a Court must consider as an adverse factor in a custody case. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 8:01 am
District and Superior Court, located downtown and at the foot of Capitol (a/k/a Jenkins) Hill. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Superior Court (1992) 7 Cal.App.4th 630, concerning taking charge of another). [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:31 pm
On September 15, 205, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Hope Academy Broadway Campus v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 6:09 pm
The court’s decision in Hoekstra v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:12 pm
Bradshaw, 14 Cal. 4th 557, 577 (1996).Today, the Superior Court issued an order to show cause to CDCR to proceed or show cause why it cannot.In other action, the LA DA has also moved to intervene in the federal lawsuit of Morales v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 1:18 pm
Bonner, et al. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:06 am
Superior Court, 16 Cal.4th 1124 (1997).) [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:24 am
Sharrock v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:00 am
The cases, all decided by the Waterbury (CT) Superior Court on Feb. 24, 2009 are: Mallory v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court denied Defendant's motion and the court's ruling was appealed. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court denied Defendant's motion and the court's ruling was appealed. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:26 am
Father appealed this decision.At the outset of its decision, the Pennsylvania Superior Court determined that the trial court wrongly injected into its decision morality concerns that the legislature had deemed irrelevant under the Child Custody Act 23 Pa.C.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:36 am
An article in today's Globe and Mail reports on a judgment by Ontario Superior Court justice D. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 5:37 pm
The court applied the new broad standard set forth in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Ry Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 4:50 am
The Court handed down Riley v Kennedy, 07-77, this week. [read post]
