Search for: "Morgan v. City of Chicago"
Results 81 - 100
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Filed February 14, 2011 byCME Group Inc., New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc., and Board of Trade of City of Chicago, Inc. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Filed February 14, 2011 byCME Group Inc., New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc., and Board of Trade of City of Chicago, Inc. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Moore Lincoln Boulevard, PO Box 249 Shawneetown, Illinois 62984-0249 Phone: 618/269-3140 Fax: 618/269-4324 Greene V. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:47 am
Ken Levinson, Chicago. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 4:39 am
Selected items by law firms recently posted on the InternetSource: Lexology in cooperation with the Association of Corporate Counsel[Click on caption to access item posted on the Internet]Court, not arbitrator, decides contract formation question in the arbitration contextKelley Drye & Warren LLPAlfred Janiga has lived and worked in the United States for over 20 years since his arrival from Poland.Washington - Washington court holds statute of limitations doesn't apply to arbitrationStoel… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Morgan (Pensacola, FL)Virgin Records v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
Click Here City of Ann Arbor agrees to environmental study of parking supply in settlement with Great Lakes Environmental Law Center. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Epstein (Chicago), Neal K. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human ServicesAtlanta Federal Center, Suite 3B7061 Forsyth Street, S.W.Atlanta, GA 30303-8909Voice Phone (404)562-7886FAX (404)562-7881TDD (404)331-2867Region V - Chicago (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin)Valerie Morgan-Alston, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 12:27 am
s Enron Exposure ECA and Local 134 IBEW Joint Pension Trust of Chicago, plaintiffs-appellants v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Columbia Sportswear successful in reducing counterfeits in China (IP Dragon) Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court orders New Apple Concept Technology to pay Apple 400,000 Yuan in damages for trade mark infringement and unfair competition (DeBund) 2386 IPR cases dealt with by Culture Administrations in Q3 (DeBund) Well-known trade marks can be recognised on basis of the products’ sales volumes (DeBund) Judicial Criteria for copyright cases (part 2) (DeBund) Beer and… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
View the original article here Print this. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
In finding its application of Kravis proper, the Board found that the Respondent could not have relied on the due process standard overruled by Kravis as well settled when it withdrew recognition of the union, because the Supreme Court's earlier decision in NLRB v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Sorich, No. 06-4251 Convictions and sentences for mail fraud and making materially false statements to federal investigators in relation to patronage appointments in the City of Chicago's civil service are affirmed over defendants' arguments that: 1) their actions did not constitute mail fraud; 2) the honest services mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. section 1346, is unconstitutionally vague; 3) they did not deprive the city or the people of Chicago of any… [read post]
