Search for: "Mosley v. Doe"
Results 81 - 100
of 223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm
He acts for Max Mosley on application to the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:00 am
In such cases, “freedom of expression requires a more narrow interpretation”: Mosley v UK (App. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
The belief of the journalist (even if reasonable) does not decide the matter (Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EMLR 679). [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:45 am
In Galloway v William Frederick Frazer, Google Inc t/a YouTube and others, Mr Justice Horner in the High Court of Northern Ireland refused an application by Google Inc. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
The CDA does not provide a basis for refusing to enforce the Equustek Order The only case relied upon by the California court for the legal proposition that the CDA gave Google immunity from the Equustek Order is Barnes v Yahoo. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:32 am
See, Internet justice: Mosley v Google. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
That is how it was put, only six months ago, in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom (App No 48009/08), 10 May 2011. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:42 pm
This public interest derives, he says, from the conduct of the police in investigating these sorts of offences, and in the execution of search warrants, being a matter of public importance: There is always a public interest in knowing what the police does in the public’s name. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
The decision was, nevertheless, controversial as the all the claimants were awarded more than the previous highest damages in a privacy case (the £60,000 paid to Max Mosley in 2008. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
And does it necessarily imply a draconian framework of state interference? [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Reed v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
Barnes v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm
Part 1 – Adrienne Page QC Case Law: OPO v James Rhodes (formerly MLA): Pianist’s book unbanned, no intention to cause distress – Dan Tench Case Law: Mosley v Google Inc, Data Protection claim against Google to go to trial – Lorna Skinner Privacy Issues in New Zealand: Sex with the Office Lights on – Nicole Moreham Case Law: Vidal-Hall v Google, Distress damages can be awarded under s 13 DPA without pecuniary loss (and misuse of… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
The Dewani case is a horrendous one, whatever the outcome, but the coverage in the English media to date does not appear to be helping the administration of justice. [read post]
8 May 2011, 10:55 pm
The paper, which is aimed at informing MPs, does not reach any conclusions but does provide a useful and detailed review of the reality behind the press coverage. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
This does not seem desirable in the interests of justice. [read post]
