Search for: "Movant's Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause"
Results 81 - 100
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
After six months, Blake's employment was terminated, allegedly for cause. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 4:24 pm
" Once the movant's burden is met, the burden shifts to the opposing party to establish the existence of a material issue of fact. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
When determining whether to grant a preliminary injunction, this Court must balance the following four factors: (1) whether the movant has shown a strong likelihood of success on the merits; (2) whether the movant will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not issued; (3) whether the issuance of the injunction would cause substantial harm to others; and (4) whether the public interest would be served by issuing the injunction. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:26 pm
According to the movants, the basis for contesting the will is the discovery of new evidence, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(2), which suggests a strong probability that the respondents exerted undue influence on the decedent, causing her to change her will; and, that such evidence could not have been found with due diligence prior to the will being admitted to probate. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 pm
For these (mostly Western oriented) civil society actors the answer was clear, though appalling from the perspective of history—a mandatory extraterritoriality imposed on powerful states to act as global agents through their national courts to discipline multinationals operating anywhere.[9] More interesting still, these civil society elements sought to use their critique to advance another agenda—the inversion of traditional international law, positing a character of… [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 5:45 pm
According to the movants, the basis for contesting the will is the discovery of new evidence, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(2), which suggests a strong probability that the respondents exerted undue influence on the decedent, causing her to change her will; and, that such evidence could not have been found with due diligence prior to the will being admitted to probate. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
To prevail on a motion to dismiss, the movant bears the initial burden to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the action `is based on, relates to, or is in response to the party’s exercise’ of free speech. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
§ 27.011(b).To prevail on a motion to dismiss, the movant bears the initial burden to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the action `is based on, relates to, or is in response to the party's exercise’ of free speech. [read post]
11 May 2014, 6:37 pm
Therefore, so much of the petitioner's order to show cause in the discovery proceeding as seeks to clone all of the computers at John's Farms is denied at this time, with leave to renew. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 6:55 pm
Therefore, so much of the petitioner's order to show cause in the discovery proceeding as seeks to clone all of the computers at John's Farms is denied at this time, with leave to renew. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 8:15 pm
The New Jersey Courts have consistently held that in order to prevail on an Order to Show Cause, the proponent must show that action by the court is necessary to avoid irreparable harm from being done. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:42 pm
The Assigned Justice in the Kings County Action concluded that it was inappropriate for her to address the application before her in light of the pending action before this Court, stating that "the order to show cause is declined because another action is pending for the same relief in Nassau County". [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:03 pm
Regardless of whether the temporary restraining order contained in the August 27, 2007 Order to Show Cause precluded the cross-motion at the time it was originally interposed, that TRO had long expired by the time the cross-motion was actually submitted to the court. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 6:19 pm
Regardless of whether the temporary restraining order contained in the August 27, 2007 Order to Show Cause precluded the cross-motion at the time it was originally interposed, that TRO had long expired by the time the cross-motion was actually submitted to the court. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:52 pm
A showing of "good cause" presupposes a showing that public access to the records is likely to harm a compelling interest to the movant. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:52 am
A full copy of the court’s order is available here. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 5:51 pm
A Nassau County DWI Lawyer said the issue to be resolved in this case is a summary judgment should be ordered by the court based on the foregoing. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 12:18 pm
The Court reversed the motion court's order to the extent appealed from and hold that the motions to quash the subpoenas should have been denied in all respects. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Summary judgment shall only be granted when there are no issues of material fact and the evidence requires the court to direct a judgment in favor of the movant as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 10:11 am
It will cause problems with the court's docket. [read post]
