Search for: "Mrs. Lilly" Results 81 - 100 of 277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am by Kevin Russell
There was no real dispute that the supervisor had harassed the plaintiff (For example, “Mr. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm by nedaj
www.colefrieman.com January 4, 2016 Clients, Friends, Associates:While the holiday season is a cause for celebration and reflection, it is also the busiest time of the year for most investment managers. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 Claire referred to the HGS v Lilly [2011] UKSC 51 and Actavis v Lilly [2015] EWHC 3294 (Pat) cases as examples of patents which did not have data in them and yet were found to be plausible. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:52 am
A wife complaints to the Qadi about her husband's impotence Artist: Hamse-i Atai (18th century Ottoman miniature) Source Wikipedia Mr Justice Birss: Actavis and Others v Eli Lilly and Another [2016] EWHC 1955 (Pat) (10 Aug 2016)  Although it is not spelt out anywhere in the 492 paragraphs and annexes to Mr Justice Birss's judgment, this complicated [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:52 am
 Mr Justice Carr found all three patents to be invalid.The 417 patent:This patent claimed daptomycin doses of 3-10 mg/kg to be taken once every 24 hours. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:01 am by nedaj
Further investigation by our firm, however, has revealed that Mr. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:54 pm
Mr Justice Arnold  - "principallyconcerned  with" being a Patents Judgeor just "concerned with"? [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
Astra’s esomeprazole patent was found invalid for inutility in any event because certain promises were not made out even with confidential inhouse tests (paras. 214, 215, 367).[8] In the NOC case before Mr. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
| Actavis v Lilly | EU public consultation on neighbouring rights | Life as an IP Lawyer in San Francisco | Copyright in chess games | Trade surplus and IP | Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics v AbbVie Biotechnology. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:46 am
.* American Science's mobile X-ray scanner patent validAmerikat Annsley reports Mr Justice Arnold's decision in American Science & Engineering Inc v Rapiscan Systems Limited - but try as she might she can't find a cited case.* If you need to prove use as part of your opposition, this is for you Valentina Torelli discusses the General Court's decision  T-638/14 (Spanish) which seems to say that assessment of proof of use of a trade mark… [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Brian commented that perhaps Mr Justice Arnold (who has heard the Warner-Lambert and Lilly cases), is not looking at the claims from the right perspective. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
| Actavis v Lilly | EU public consultation on neighbouring rights | Life as an IP Lawyer in San Francisco | Copyright in chess games | Trade surplus and IP | Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics v AbbVie Biotechnology. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:59 am
 * Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics can use declaratory relief to clear the way for its Humira biosimilar in the UK, rules Mr Justice Carr Annsley pens of Mr Justice Carr’s decision in Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics v AbbVie Biotechnology [2016] EWHC 374. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:51 am
 Among the list are two parties that are frequent users of the English judicial system - Eli Lilly and Actavis. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
 * Interim injunctions and preliminary issues cannot be divorced in latest generic pain dispute before Mr Justice ArnoldAnnsley pens of Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz[2016] EWHC 493, which flags up a new generic battle in the English Patents Court and is a helpful reminder to those who may be considering bouncing their opponents into court hearing without proper notice. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 pm
Notably, Mr Battistelli has apparently lost the crucial support of Mr Jesper Kongstad, the Chair of the Administrative Council, who had until now been one of Battistelli’s key defenders. [read post]