Search for: "Murphy v. California"
Results 81 - 100
of 541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
The answer to both questions is no.A few years ago, when we were all waiting for a decision in Murphy v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 12:34 pm
Six characteristics, set forth in a California Supreme Court case called Tunkl. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:29 pm
The Court then explained its holding in light of Murphy v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:17 pm
In a decision of great interest to California employers, the California Supreme Court yesterday agreed to settle the dispute among California's Courts of Appeal regarding whether the "payment" of one hour's pay at the employee's usual rate for a missed meal and/or break period mandated by California Labor Code §226.7 is a "wage" subject to a three- or four- year statute of limitations or a… [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
” See Murphy v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:50 am
Answer: By David Murphy and Gabrielle Wirth First, let’s talk about the law in the Ninth Circuit, which governs the West Coast, and California. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
One of the best published opinions regarding the executive exemption was Murphy v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
This post examines an opinion from the California Court of Appeal – First District: In re Rafael C., 2016 WL 1178374 (2016). [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
The ruling is notable in underscoring how the Supreme Court's sports-betting decision in Murphy v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 7:17 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:34 pm
Murphy Oil USA and Ernst & Young LLP v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:14 pm
Superior Court (4/12/12) --- Cal.4th ---, was probably the most highly anticipated Supreme Court employment law decision since Murphy v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:15 am
United States, 179 F.3d 29, 35 (1999), but says it has been undercut by Murphy v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Then, just last year, in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:59 pm
Murphy is a family law case where Ann Murphy sought to obtain attorney's fees for representing Mr. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:58 pm
" Here's What The Court Decided: In Berthelot v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 11:46 am
"On Additional Hour of Pay" under California Labor Code Section 226.7 Constitutes Wage or Premium Pay Subject to Three-Year Statute of Limitations Period, not a Penalty Subject to One-Year Limitations Period, California Supreme Court Holds In a case that will have a substantial and immediate impact on labor law class action cases, the California Supreme Court today issued its long-awaited decision in Murphy v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:17 am
[POL roundup; Santa Clara v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
The following article was written by Matt Murphy and Tommy Murphy of Murphy Law Firm for the Autumn 2020 edition of Trial Trends. [read post]
