Search for: "Murphy v. Cole"
Results 81 - 100
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2008, 6:00 am
(b), (c); Murphy v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:17 pm
In National Steel & Shipbuilding v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 6:38 am
(Murphy v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:41 am
See Murphy v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 7:43 am
The latest case in point is a New York Times op-ed by ACLU leaders David Cole and Daniel Mach. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 2:04 pm
" (Murphy v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 11:46 am
"On Additional Hour of Pay" under California Labor Code Section 226.7 Constitutes Wage or Premium Pay Subject to Three-Year Statute of Limitations Period, not a Penalty Subject to One-Year Limitations Period, California Supreme Court Holds In a case that will have a substantial and immediate impact on labor law class action cases, the California Supreme Court today issued its long-awaited decision in Murphy v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:33 pm
” In 2007, the California Supreme Court held that the hour of additional pay for missed meal or rest breaks is not a penalty but a premium wage that compensates employees (Murphy v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 10:35 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., 40 Cal.4th 1094 (2007), White v. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 10:48 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:51 am
See Murphy v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 6:22 pm
In June, in Davenport v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:53 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
See Cole v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
See Cole v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:11 am
” For The New York Times, Melina Delcik offers an inside look at how the Times covered this term’s sports-betting case, Murphy v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:45 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
Employees Cannot Obtain “Double Recovery” of Unpaid Wages and Premiums for Non-Compliant Rest Breaks
26 Oct 2020, 3:24 pm
App. 4th 864 (2013) (employees paid on a piece-rate basis must still be compensated for time spent on rest breaks) and Murphy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 10:56 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
