Search for: "Murphy v. IRS"
Results 81 - 100
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2007, 6:32 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 12:18 pm
An update on the Murphy v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:34 pm
"6.31 In the case of M.Q. v Robert Gleeson and others [1997] IEHC 26; [1998] 4 IR 85, Mr Justice Barr took the view that health boards had an implied right and duty to communicate information about a possible child abuser if, by failing to do so, the safety of some children might be put at risk. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:06 am
The general perception in the legal community has been that they are tax free, a dangerous and incorrect perception post Murphy v IRS and there was no shortage of settlement brokers angling to write these cases on the false promise that they could be done so income tax free and under the protective umbrella of section 104 and section 130. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
Feeney J effectively held that the plaintiff was entitled to ordinary compensatory damages, but he failed to appreciate that such damages include damages for distress (Conway v Ireland [1991] 2 IR 305, 317, [1991] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ; Griffin J and McCarthy JJ concurring); Shortt v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána [2007] 4 IR 587, 612, [2007] IESC 9 (21 March 2007) [82] (Murray CJ), [2007] 4 IR 587, 648, [2007]… [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note Clarke… [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 7:08 am
When the IRS took the position that Murphy's damages were taxable, it essentially made a two-step analysis. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 6:11 pm
IRS. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:27 pm
Millemann of Weintraub Genshlea Chediak in the firm's IP Law Blog State found liable for beating on UT campus - Tennessee lawyer John Day of Day & Blair in his blog, Day on Torts ESOPs and company stock matches to 401(k): the Bear Stearns lesson - Lancaster attorney Michael Moore of Russell Krafft & Gruber in the firm's Pennsylvania Employment Law Blog Government reply briefly field with Supreme Court in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 9:37 am
The TaxProf Blog [pointed out via Instapundit ] reports the decision in Murphy v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
Circuit Court in sequential rulings, was Murphy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 4:44 pm
With the recent decision in Murphy vs IRS, as well as a surge in sexual abuse settlements, qui tam cases, wrongful imprisonment verdicts and other taxable cases the necessity of tax planning has never been greater. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 2:17 am
" In Murphy v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 3:12 pm
The 2018 Supreme Court case Murphy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
It may be for the IRS what Sackett v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:48 am
Murphy’s book Administrative Law & Practice is cited in the following article: Jarrett Faber, Kisor v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:16 pm
(The case is Murphy v IRTC [1999] 1 IR 26, or Murphy v Ireland at the European level). [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 3:36 pm
Rapid Settlements Murphy v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:52 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
