Search for: "Myers v. Doe et al" Results 81 - 100 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2010, 4:45 am
(Patent Docs) Reyataz (Atazanavir): US: Patent infringement complaint filed following a Paragraph IV certification: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari (09-533) Petition for certiorari (09-547) Brief in opposition (09-533/547) Brief in opposition for the federal respondent (09-533/547) Petitioners’ reply (09-533) Petitioners’ reply (09-547) Amicus brief of members of Congress (09-533/547) Amicus brief of American Mosquito Control Association et al. (09-533/547) Amicus brief of Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Foundation… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
The Court's denial of review of Rasul, et al., v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:26 pm
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear argument on  the constitutional status of monuments placed in public parks by private groups or individiuals, in the case of Pleasant Grove City, et al., v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 9:29 pm
Myers, et al., can be found here. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:00 pm
Alpharma, Inc., Caligor, Inc.; et al. , a 29-page, 2-1 decision, Judge Riley writes:The Kovachs raise one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: Whether the trial court erred by entering summary judgment in favor of the Cup Defendants. [read post]