Search for: "Myers v. State of N. C"
Results 81 - 98
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(N. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:21 pm
Smith, 531 F.3d 1261, 1266 n. 2 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting United States v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:52 am
Myers, 2009 U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) US Patents Applying Supreme Court precedent: Carlsbad Technology v HIF Bio (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) USPTO not laying off employees (IP Watchdog) USPTO maintenance fees (Patently-O) Merchants warranty of non-infringement (Patently-O) PLI patent bar review tour (IP Watchdog) Provisional patent applications: waiting to file non-provisionals (Patently-O) 35 USC § 315(C) and its uncodified cousin – inter partes re-examination… [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
[5] I.R.C § 501(c)(3) (2000) [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
Huff Trust, Lloyd N. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Code §2307.76(c); Vaccariello v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
" Id.So we're reduced to reading tea leaves here - but with Lohr that's not unusual.With respect to these rather undefined "parallel" claims, the Court in Lohr held that "[n]othing in 360k denies [a state] the right to provide a traditional damages remedy for violations of common-law duties when those duties parallel federal requirements. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Haagen, Professor of Law, Duke University School of Law--Raymond C. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Code §2307.76(c); Howland v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am
[c] Our calculations of OR and 95% CI for 3rd gen. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
Warren Co., 134 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir. 1998); Myers v. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 3:48 am
[L][W] Myers, Michael J. [read post]
