Search for: "NAME v. Department of Revenue"
Results 81 - 100
of 746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:39 am
Summary of Decision issued June 22, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Freudenthal v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:54 pm
Department of Education. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 8:36 am
A revenue department that outsources collections can offer the contractor compensation in the form of a percentage of the taxes collected.A case in Georgia, City of Atlanta v. hotels.com, 654 S.E.2d 166, (Ga. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm
However, the Court held in Riether v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:50 pm
In total, Butler caused a tax loss to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of $1,093,400. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
” EM Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:12 am
I think the circuit decision bears noting, if only because there’s a pending petition for writ of certiorari under the name Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Selmont, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:16 pm
In the recent case of Varrenti v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
With those observations, the Court turned to the second prong of its test, namely that the official must purport to be speaking in an official capacity. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 11:45 am
The case is Walker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:36 pm
(Receiver of) v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:16 pm
TREASURY DEPARTMENT CIRCULAR 230 REGULATIONS. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:38 am
Musta v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:26 am
” The revenues were transferred to the Roberto Clemente Sports District Fund for the use of the Department of Sports and Recreation. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 5:57 am
The detailed “customer information report” filed with the Colorado Department of Revenue must outline purchases made by local residents including names, addresses, and total amounts spent. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
It observes that the prohibition is irrevocable, which is unique to Huawei and one other company (ZTE Corporation, which Trump controversially rescued from a Commerce Department punishment last year). [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
In Nash v. [read post]
