Search for: "NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY"
Results 81 - 100
of 164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
Environmental Protection Agency's proposed 'Waters of the United States' (WOTUS) rule. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
Environmental Protection Agency in Ann Arbor since 1978. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm
USGS Open-File Report: 2014-1189 Pesticide trends in major rivers of the United States, 1992-2010 2014, Ryberg, Karen R.; Vecchia, Aldo V.; Gilliom, Robert J.; Martin, Jeffrey D. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 10:51 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was not required to consult with the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:38 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:39 am
The en banc decision addresses the Endangered Species Act (ESA) requirement that federal agencies must consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Marine Fisheries Service (Service) prior to taking any agency action that could affect an endangered or threatened species or its critical habitat. … [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:36 am
The en banc decision addresses the Endangered Species Act (ESA) requirement that federal agencies must consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Marine Fisheries Service (Service) prior to taking any agency action that could affect an endangered or threatened species or its critical habitat. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm
L. 311 (2013).CPIA import restrictions prohibit designated archaeological and ethnological objects from entering the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:53 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed with leave to amend (pdf) a suit alleging that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) violated section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by failing to consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service on the effects of 382… [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 3:42 pm
Plaintiffs challenged FWS’s determination, citing National Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:13 pm
The Center for Biological Diversity and Pacific Environment brought suit challenging the regulations and accompanying environmental review documents under the MMPA, Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), and National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:51 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:03 pm
See Florida Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:08 am
Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
