Search for: "NICHOLAS v. NICHOLAS"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,985
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Candidate, Stanford University), Nicholas T. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
I have just finished reading Nicholas Orme’s book, Going to Church in Medieval England, which I commend as a fascinating and instructive read. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
Nicholas Gilbert was arrested on charges that included trespassing and failing to appear in court for a traffic violation. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Carusillo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:22 am
NICHOLAS YEDINAK, Petitioner, v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
Secondly, this regulation has received new scrutiny after the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in NYSRPA v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm
Kohli v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:01 am
In the case of Matter of D’Amico v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
A Dailge & Daniel V. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:20 am
The post NICHOLAS HUNT v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am
By Sophia Williams From 1933 to 1945, during the Nazi party’s rise to power, the Nazis looted, confiscated, or involuntarily transferred more than half a million artworks owned by Jewish art collectors and other victims.[1] Following Nazi party looting before and after World War II, thousands of artworks ended up in museum collections around the world, including in New York, and remain there today.[2] A recent act passed in August 2022 “to amend the education law, in relation to notice… [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
., Nicholas v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:32 am
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (The Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales and Lords Justices Arnold and Nugee) Match Group, LLC and others s v Muzmatch Ltd and another [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (27 April 2023)This was an appeal against the decision of Mr Nicholas Caddick QC that the defendants had infringed the claimants' trade marks and were liable for passing off (see Match Group LLC and others v [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
In the landmark case of Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Napolitano and Nicholas Tuffarelli of counsel), for petitioner. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Napolitano and Nicholas Tuffarelli of counsel), for petitioner. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 2:55 am
Here it is: Kluge v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
