Search for: "National City Trading Corp. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Collective Scienter does not apply to false patent marking: Heathcote Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Collective Scienter does not apply to false patent marking: Heathcote Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Third IP cross-retaliation strike against USA at WTO (Excess Copyright) World Economic Forum survey: US 18th in global IP protection (Intellectual Property Watch) Funds for US State Department global IP enforcement training (Intellectual Property Watch) Changes in USPTO senior management (Patent Docs)   US Patents PatentFreedom to offer subscription-based reexam service to attack NPE patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46)   South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP)   Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
– no ECJ referrals on trade mark cases (Class 46) Depreciation for registered trade marks only (Class 46) (IP finance) Krakow City seeks protection for Hejnał Mariacki as sound trade mark (Class 46) Are the shoemaker’s children always ill-shod? [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  Usually, this occurs when governments issue surveillance directives requiring production of data held outside their national borders. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
Petitioners’ reply   United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in determining price in recent… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP)   Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]