Search for: "Nestle Chocolate " Results 81 - 100 of 223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2016, 4:53 am
These two feuding chocolate makers never seem to take a break from litigation, so this KitKat won’t be surprised if an appeal from the refusal to amend the mark soon follows. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 9:24 am
They have been exporting to, and selling in, Malaysia, Swiss-made chocolates such as “Toblerone” and “Nestlechocolates. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 10:26 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
While the Nestle Corporation is most well known for its many sweets – chocolate and candy products like a Nestle Crunch bar – the company is also major producer of other food items. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 6:15 pm by Anthony Marangon
In an article in Clinical Infections Diseases dug a bit deeper into the Nestle Tollhouse Cookie Dough E. coli O157:H7 outbreak of 2009. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:59 am by Jani Ihalainen
The bars comprise four individual chocolate wafer fingers connected to each other with a solid chocolate base. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:47 am
 As such, Nestlé had failed to pass the CJEU test on acquired distinctiveness, and Arnold J confirmed that the shape of the KitKat chocolate bar, having acquired no distinctive character through use, is not eligible for registration. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
” An animated Hershey’s Kiss hands a Reese’s Peanut Buttercup a ticket to a sprawling candy-filled venue, featuring a chocolate-themed amusement ride, a parade of dancing chocolate bars, and mountains of chocolate samples. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:55 am by Ashley Shaw
Nestle, the world’s largest food producer, may have been getting cocoa on the cheap in a less than humane manner – by benefiting from child slave labor. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 8:28 pm by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Tres residentes del estado de California demandaron a las compañías Hershey, Mars y Nestlé, alegando que estas son culpables de publicidad falsa al no revelar en las etiquetas la utilización de esclavitud infantil por parte de las compañías. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm by admin
**Nestle Defends Class Action in the Central District of California with Successful Motion to Dismiss and Sets Valuable Precedent With California Transparency in Supply Chains Act Safe Harbor Defense** . . . [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 2:58 am by Amy Howe
” At medium, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy discusses a petition for review filed by chocolate giant Nestlé in a case that “arose when several John Does from Cote D’Ivoire in Africa sued Nestlé for aiding and abetting their enslavement as children,” and she contends that, if “the Supreme Court takes the case and agrees with Nestlé, then these arguments could insulate all multinational corporations from answering for human… [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 12:10 am
Perhaps not, if it’s used for a biscuit tin or a box of chocolates -- which is why we selected a product for which even The Night Watch must surely be sufficiently distinctive: the chemical element strontium. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
The onus would be on Nestle to show that the shape of the chocolate bar, regardless of the inclusion of the words "Kit Kat", would be indicative of the source of the bar by itself (i.e. a distinctive feature). [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Flour is used in candies such as licorice, KitKats, and Nestle’s Crunch. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:10 am
This case seems to begetting out of hand ...To recap, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling on Wednesday 16 September in the '3D chocolate finger' trade mark case,  Case C-215/14 Nestlé v Cadbury [noted by Eleonora here]. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Really.* Nestlé's Kit Kat: a one-sided debate? [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
* "Kit Kat copy cats are OK, says court: Cadbury kills off bid by Nestlé to trademark distinctive four finger shape of the chocolate bar": report here* "Kit Kat goes unprotected as European court rejects trademark case. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 11:28 pm
At the very end of August, this weblog hosted a guest comment by a German attorney, Thomas Farkas, in which he gave a strikingly positive slant to the deeper meaning of Advocate General Wathelet's Opinion in the controversial Nestlé v Cadbury dispute over registration of the three-dimensional shape of the Nestlé Kit Kat chocolate biscuit bar. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 3:30 am by Patrick McCallum
Cadbury, fearing Nestlé would be able to establish a monopoly on four-fingered chocolate products, raised an objection to the application. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 3:30 am by Patrick McCallum
Cadbury, fearing Nestlé would be able to establish a monopoly on four-fingered chocolate products, raised an objection to the application. [read post]