Search for: "New Murphy Oil Corp"
Results 81 - 95
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 4:31 am
Murphy Oil USA, Inc., No. 1:11CV220-LG-RHW, Slip op. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
See legal news coverage, e.g. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
Oil interests compete with agriculture needs; fears of sea level rise compete with the need for fast money to help avert crop disasters. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm
Murphy Oil USA (the appeals court in the case granted and denied the petition in part), the Supreme Court’s decision in Sessions v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Shell Oil Co., 2 Cal.3d 245, 251 (1970). [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists Happy New Year, everyone! [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
Back in 2008, Professor Michael Green wrote an interesting paper on apportionment in asbestos litigation. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
Ct. 2541 (2011), and the decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
The Court of Appeal overturned this position on the basis of a new Supreme Court of Canada decision in Pioneer Corp. v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Army Corps of Engineers violated federal environmental laws by failing to give the public enough of a say before issuing permits for mountaintop removal coal mines in West Virginia, a federal judge ruled Tuesday. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
City of New York framework to analyze his takings claim. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
Murphy, 126 S.W. 343, 345 (Tex. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
Atrium's new chief executive officer, Ahmad Zaid, testified that he tried to work out a payment plan with appellee to ensure no interruption in the delivery of linens to the hospital; however, appellee responded that it would no longer deliver linens without a payment towards Atrium's past due balance. [read post]
