Search for: "New York State Dept. Corrections" Results 81 - 100 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Pataki, 259 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 993 [1999]; Matter of McGuinn v City of New York, 219 AD2d 489, 490 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 87 NY2d 966 [1996]; Matter of Cassidy v New York City Dept. of Correction, 95 AD2d 733, 734-735 [1983]; Matter of Serth v New York State Dept. of Transp., 79 AD2d 801, 802 [1980]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Pataki, 259 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 993 [1999]; Matter of McGuinn v City of New York, 219 AD2d 489, 490 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 87 NY2d 966 [1996]; Matter of Cassidy v New York City Dept. of Correction, 95 AD2d 733, 734-735 [1983]; Matter of Serth v New York State Dept. of Transp., 79 AD2d 801, 802 [1980]). [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
”Given those discrepancies, the appellate court concluded that Corrections lacked a bonafide basis to withhold the requested footage and remitted the matter to the Albany County Supreme Court for a determination as to the fees and costs awardable to PLS, given its prevailing party status here.Looks like that FOIL foolishness got flogged.# # #Matter of Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y. v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:25 am
Comm'r, New Hampshire Dept. of Corrections, 2009 U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Correction Officers' Benevolent Association [Petitioner] filed an  Article 78 petition to challenge a determination by New York City Board of Collective Bargaining [BCB] which concluded that New York City Department of Corrections [DOC] and the City of New York [City] did not commit an improper practice under the City Collective Bargaining Law [CBL] when it altered the procedures… [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Correction Officers' Benevolent Association [Petitioner] filed an  Article 78 petition to challenge a determination by New York City Board of Collective Bargaining [BCB] which concluded that New York City Department of Corrections [DOC] and the City of New York [City] did not commit an improper practice under the City Collective Bargaining Law [CBL] when it altered the procedures… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
Fronczak sued the New York State Department of Correctional Services [DOCS], claiming that this action violated Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 USC Sections 12112-12117 and subjected him to unlawful retaliatory adverse employment actions in violation of 42 USC 1983.According to the decision by the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 2:20 am by Jeremy Saland
Adams, 8 A.D.3d 893 (3rd Dept. 2004), is a case that fortifies what is known to any competent criminal defense attorney who represents those accused of Grand Larceny and theft related crimes in New York. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 2:20 am by Jeremy Saland
Adams, 8 A.D.3d 893 (3rd Dept. 2004), is a case that fortifies what is known to any competent criminal defense attorney who represents those accused of Grand Larceny and theft related crimes in New York. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
New York firms are required to “keep correct and complete books and records of account” for the purposes of state regulators and tax authorities, N.Y. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:28 pm by Patricia Salkin
A New York appellate court held in May that a village board failed to follow the correct procedures for condemning land as part of a redevelopment project. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division's conclusion: Supreme Court properly denied and dismissed Plaintiff's CPLR Article 75 petition.* See, also, Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division's conclusion: Supreme Court properly denied and dismissed Plaintiff's CPLR Article 75 petition.* See, also, Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85. [read post]