Search for: "New York v. Belton"
Results 81 - 100
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
The Court stated that the instant case was clearly distinguishable from other cases in which the Court has upheld non-consensual searches under Article I, Section 4.United States Constitution: The Court stated that the search clearly fell within the purview of New York v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:18 am
The trial court upheld the search, since the Supreme Court decided in New York v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
In refusing to block the evidence, the trial judge relied upon the Supreme Court’s 1981 decision in New York v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 5:05 pm
The defendant's counsel did not object at trial because this type of evidence (that seized from a glove compartment as a search incident to arrest) is routinely admitted under the Supreme Court holding in New York v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 5:23 am
" New York v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:26 am
Gant, on whether under New York v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 8:42 am
Johnson, 846 F.2d 279, 282 (5th Cir. 1988) (per curiam); see also New York v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:05 am
See New York v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 3:57 am
New York, which was the law at the time, but a few months after Davis’ conviction the Supreme Court reversed Belton in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 3:29 am
Gant essentially overruled the holding in New York v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
Smith (Ohio 2009) 920 N.E.2d 949, 954, quoting New York v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:49 pm
The 1981 case of New York v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
Ohio, 17-7213, and Belton v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Gant – Court essentially overrules New York v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:26 am
In that case, they overruled New York v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
New York, but not under Arizona v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:26 am
Supreme Court’s decision in New York v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 10:24 am
The Court added that police may search the passenger compartment of a vehicle and any containers therein as a contemporaneous incident of a recent occupant’s lawful arrest on the ground that it concerned the scope of a search incident to arrest (thus distinguishing Gant from New York vs. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:45 am
The Smith opinion is at its weakest when it turns to the issue of closed containers, relying on the Supreme Court’s language in New York v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
In New York v. [read post]
