Search for: "Nicholl Claimants"
Results 81 - 100
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Damages claimed also include the difference between the price the claimants paid for Mt. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:00 am
A claimant approaches a court one day after the limitation* period expires, in the mistaken impression that the limitation period had in fact not expired. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
Kuddus v Chief Constable ([2002] 2 AC 122), the highly respected senior Law Lord, Lord Nicholls said “From time to time cases do arise where awards of compensatory damages are perceived as inadequate to achieve a just result between the parties. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm
There is no other evidence of the Claimant’s ‘bad’ behaviour and it can only be that inferences have been drawn from the information in the Convictions Document. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:56 pm
And: Another Council officer, Gary Nicholls, reported that he had received an e-mail from a British Gas contract manager alleging that one of his engineers was offered extra work by Mr Hussain in exchange for omitting various findings from his report. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
Most claimants would like a quick apology and a correction. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 1:54 pm
The “deliberate and cynical nature of the conduct” of CID, while true, was not sufficient by itself to justify disgorgement damages, pace Lord Nicholls in Blake. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
In that context, it has been held that “the values enshrined in Articles 8 and 10 are now part of the cause of action for breach of confidence” (See Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 at [17] (Lord Nicholls) and that it is necessary to consider Strasbourg jurisprudence to establish the scope of that domestic cause of action, since those Articles are now “not merely of persuasive or parallel effect” but are “the very content of the… [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:03 pm
People like James Nichols (the protagonist in the Time Magazine story) can do much better under state law. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:27 am
The bank also agreed to terminate “certain executives,” including Nichols. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:17 pm
People like James Nichols (the protagonist in the Time Magazine story) can do much better under state law. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:33 am
I’ve heard the figure used that 90% of libel cases in England and Wales are won by claimants. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:14 am
In Cream v Banerjee Lord Nicholls addressed this provision and said it demanded flexibility in its application. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:29 am
He agreed with the Court of Appeal and the dissenting speeches of Lords Nicholls and Hoffmann that the additional ifnormation served mostly to “add colour and conviction” to the story. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The point made for the Secretary of State was that the claimants’ could not make out Thlimmenos discrimination because of the difficulties in defining which HB claimants are unable to share a bedroom due the nature and extent of their disabilities. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
Because they have no sharp edges, it is a case in which, in Lord Nicholls’ words, “the position is not so clear”; but not one where Article 14 does not apply at all. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
Because they have no sharp edges, it is a case in which, in Lord Nicholls’ words, “the position is not so clear”; but not one where Article 14 does not apply at all. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:43 am
After a brief period of the courts treating the factors listed by Lord Nicholls in Reynolds as a checklist, a series of judgements made a point to correct the mistake and called instead for a more flexible and fact-sensitive approach to the public interest test. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm
.; (citing Nichols v. [read post]
