Search for: "Nina A Fisher"
Results 81 - 100
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
Coverage comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Tony Mauro of Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Ross Runkel at the Ross Runkel Report, and Daniel Fisher of Forbes. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
As Lyle reported on Saturday for this blog, the Obama administration filed a brief in the Fifth Circuit proceedings in Fisher v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
” In his column for the Washington Post, George Will urges the Court to grant cert. in Fisher v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:29 am
Daniel Fisher of Forbes’s Full Disclosure blog observes that the ruling “once again confounded critics who accuse [the Supreme Court] of a pro-business bias. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
He discusses those views and Fisher v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am
Coverage comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR (audio). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am
Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Richard Wolf at USA Today, Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog, and Tony Mauro at Law.com (subscription or registration required) also covered the argument. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am
” A report on the success of the GOP’s strategy comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am
Allie Spence & Horne Solicitors Michael Ashe Southwark Law Centre Abimbola Badejo 5 Pump Court Rebecca Bahar Cambridge House Christopher Balog Arden Chambers Samitra Balu Tyndallwoods Solicitors Frances Barratt South West Law (Legal Services in the Community) Ltd Justin Bates Arden Chambers Ian Beachley Moss Beachley Mullem & Coleman Sophie Bell Hodge Jones & Allen LLP Lucia Benyu Peters Legal Ann Bevington Fisher… [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
I covered the case at my own blog, with other coverage coming from Mark Walsh, who provided a “view” from the Courtroom for this blog; Nina Totenberg of NPR (with an earlier story here); Daniel Fisher of Forbes, who reports that “it seemed likely the court will split 4-4, leaving a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding a federal judge’s injunction against the immigration policy intact”; and Steven Mazie in The Economist. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
” Daniel Fisher of Forbes reports on Monday’s cert. grant in Magner v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
Keith Tallon Cook Taylor Caroline Landes McMillan Williams Helen MacDonald Aitken Associates Martin Wray Aitken Associates Kelly Wild Aitken Associates Peter Harris Harris Temperley Caron Theobalds Harris Temperley Stewart Hughan Harris Temperley Nina Shaw Harris Temperley Philip Wilkins Hudgell & Partners Elizabeth Bendall Sternberg Reed Gordon Reed Sternberg Reed Darren Ward Sternberg Reed Jenny Morrison Morrison Spowart Karen Forrester Mackesys… [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am
More coverage comes from Michael Bobelian in Forbes, Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog, and Daniel Fisher in Forbes. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am
” Daniel Fisher discusses the decision in Forbes, noting that the Justice Clarence Thomas “wrote a dissent raising deep questions about the rights of citizens versus the government and the reach of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm
Sutton’s article Asynchronous, E-Learning in Legal Education: A Comparative Study with the Traditional Classroom is cited in the following article: Nina A. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog, with other coverage coming from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Jeremy Jacobs of Greenwire, and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
Other coverage of yesterday’s decision comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Bill Mears of CNN, Daniel Fisher of Forbes, and Jaclyn Belcyzk of JURIST. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
At Forbes, Daniel Fisher reports on the denials in a trio of class-action cases, observing that the rejections may reflect “the new reality of a 4-4 split between conservatives and liberals. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
” At NPR, Nina Totenberg reports on Tuesday’s decision in Moore v. [read post]
