Search for: "Norris v. Norris"
Results 81 - 100
of 504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2010, 10:33 am
Here's the first post written by the new addition to Archer Norris' appellate team, Gary A. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 2:18 am
Smith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
Norris v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:25 am
On Wednesday, Mr Justice Norris (Chancery Division, England and Wales) gave his ruling in Burrows v Smith, Crush Digital Media Ltd [2010] EWHC 22 (Ch), an interesting little copyright/breach of confidence dispute. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
Schnitt, Barry v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:50 am
Here is the abstract: In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 2:58 pm
Get Off My Floating Homestead: In Norris v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
Realty, LLC v Norris, McLaughlin, & Marcus, P.C. 2023 NY Slip Op 31851(U) June 2, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155004/2022 Judge: Lori S. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:01 am
The State also argued under Norris v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 11:16 am
Norris v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:51 am
In the recent case (Norris v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:41 pm
Thames at Archer Norris. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:36 am
But Section 1983 claims have their pitfalls, as demonstrated in this case.The case is Naumovski v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:01 am
Senator Norris Brown of Nebraska proposed the Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
The recent case of Norris v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 9:54 pm
Justice Stewart pointed out that the mailbox rule applied to the final step in a workers' comp appeal -- the filing of a notice of appeal from the Circuit to the Appellate Court -- under Harrisburg-Raleigh, and to appeals from the arbitrator to the Commission under Norris v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:02 am
This Kat has been reviewing Amanda Michaels' (and Andrew Norris') book "A practical approach to Trade Mark Law". [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:10 pm
The Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District, Division Three, recently published its decision in Gundogdu v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:32 am
Because Norris Patrick was a taxpayer in Brookings County, he had standing under SDCL 11–2–61. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
This morning the Court of Appeal (Jacob and Sedley LJJ and Norris J) handed down its judgment in Nokia v IPCom [2011] EWCA Civ 6.By way of back story: IPCom (described in the judgment as a “non practising entity”, i.e. a patentee with no business of its own in products covered by the patents), owned a number of patents (which it had bought from Bosch) in the field of mobile communications technology. [read post]
