Search for: "North Dakota v. United States of America" Results 81 - 100 of 103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm by Bexis
McIntyre Machinery America, Ltd., 987 A.2d 575 (N.J. 2010), deal with personal jurisdiction in product liability matters brought in state court. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, January 27, 2010 EPA has entered into a Consent Agreement with Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc. and Hydro Aluminum Precision Tubing North America, LLC, wholly owned subsidiaries of Norsk Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
The warming climate is driving several thousand people north, to Copenhagen — for two weeks, anyway. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
As a result of the 1975 amendments, all of Texas, Alaska and now Arizona came under the law, as did several counties in California, Colorado, Florida, New York, North Carolina and South Dakota and two townships in Michigan. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
It has been introduced in legislatures all over the nation, and has passed in both chambers in Oklahoma and one in South Dakota. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:48 am
Thus, however obviously sensible it would be to join North Dakota and South Dakota together in "Dakota," that can't be done without the consent of each of the states (as well as Congress), and, of course, one cannot imagine circumstances where the Dakotas would decide that having two senators is better than the present four;2) the right, guaranteed in Article V, to each state to veto any change in the… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]