Search for: "O.C. V. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2012, 7:18 am by Thomas Heintzman
So held the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in Subway Franchise System of Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 7:33 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
  So held the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in Subway Franchise System of Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:02 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
As I reported in my article posted on January 2018, in South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority v. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
” The TR stated that they were minimum requirements and that the contractor was “to identify any areas where the works need to be designed to any additional or more rigorous requirements or parameters” and that “[t]he design of the foundations shall ensure a lifetime of 20 years in every aspect without planned replacement. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
In arriving at this conclusion, the court applied the principles stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Commonwealth Construction Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 7:53 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
” Such a principle “states in general terms a requirement of justice from which more specific legal doctrines may be derived. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:45 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The recent decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court in Boxer Capital Corp. v. [read post]