Search for: "OJ Basics"
Results 81 - 100
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
These rules are enacted pursuant to the EPC (see A 23(4) and R 12(3)) and are binding on the BoA (Article 23 RPBA). [5] The basic principle relating to the conduct of appeal proceedings is to be found in Article 12(1) RPBA, which states that: “(1) Appeal proceedings shall be based on (a) the notice of appeal and statement of grounds of appeal, (b) any written reply of any other party and (c) any communication sent by the BoA and any answer thereto filed pursuant to directions of the… [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
OJ’s thanks to him for these contributions. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:49 pm
Both bodies of law prohibit the conduct because their respective norms are basically co-extensive. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 12:54 pm
At OJ, Marty Lederman also has a guest post on the meaning of the signing statement that accompanied the President’s signature on the NDAA, and then there is a response post giving pushback on many of the basic international law assumptions in all of the above discussions from OJ’s Kevin Jon Heller. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
I have pointed out in earlier blog posts at both Volokh and OJ that Libya is an important marker of operational targeting law. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:54 am
Stalin and Mao ran their countries as dictators, and ignored the basic rule of communist law of their own communist governments. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
He wrote a series of posts from Durban for OJ, which are well worth reading, and his latest post sums up the glass-half-full optimist view: As compared to the expectations going in, the outcome was more than I think most people thought possible. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:34 am
They may also be fulfilled by identification of the basic goods or services enabling the competent authorities and economic operators to determine the essential characteristics and objective properties of the goods and services concerned. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:39 am
” I understand this had some of the OJ members on hiring committees pretty excited – Vindication! [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:46 pm
There are two basic ways to interpret these moves, though they are not mutually exclusive. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
There’s a lot of material here that will be of interest to OJ readers. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 4:26 pm
Basically, the State makes people pay $210.00 and fill out a form to get assigned a number. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
They start by giving the basic principle in answer 1. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:42 pm
It was a little more basic than I had hoped for. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
This decision deals with the admissibility of the appeal filed by the opponent following the rejection of its opposition by the Opposition Division (OD).The opponent (Dynamit Nobel Defence GmbH) was represented by professional representative (PR) Andreas S., member of the law firm (Vertretergemeinschaft) “Patente, Marken & Lizenzen”, which is closely associated with the Chemetall company, as its postal address suggests:Patente, Marken & Lizenzen c/o Chemetall GmbHTrakehner… [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
Basic principles, second paragraph). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Remember Vincent Bugliosi's 75% rule from his book Outrage about the OJ Simpson trial. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 1:46 pm
TV shows for her extended family, a line of perfume, make-up, clothes, clothes stores, basically everything. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:37 am
(Kenneth Anderson) A few days ago, I asked the question (over at the international law blog Opinio Juris), what are the best legal arguments that would permit or preclude military intervention in Libya, by the US or some other party or parties, on humanitarian grounds (other than rescue of one’s own nationals)? [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:03 am
by Kenneth Anderson A few days ago, I asked the question (here), what are the best legal arguments that would permit or preclude military intervention in Libya, by the US or some other party or parties, on humanitarian grounds (other than rescue of one’s own nationals)? [read post]
