Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel Supreme Court of Ohio" Results 81 - 100 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2010, 2:30 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
On what legal authority does the Supreme Court of Mississippi or Mississippi Bar rely to enter an order promulgating a rule which would require giving away services (to persons not having a right to counsel) having such substantial value? [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U.S. 626 (1985). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:33 am by Russ Bensing
  The first is the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:44 am by Jeff Gamso
A great win for a lawyer, a major break for the client, a silly and frankly wrongheaded decision.The state asked the Ohio Supreme Court to hear the case, which it did. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
  Smith was one more decision than the Ohio Supreme Court came out with last week; not even a disciplinary opinion chastising some miscreant attorney. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am by Priscilla Smith
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio that limited factual disclosures serve the state’s interest in protecting the public from misleading and deceptive commercial speech. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
No opinions from the Ohio Supreme Court last week, but the justices weren’t on summer vacation:  they heard oral argument in nine cases, three involving sex offender registration. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U.S. 626 (1985), Milavetz, Gallp & Milavetz, P.A. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by Dan Maurer
The answer has become less straightforward thanks to a recent Supreme Court opinion. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 5:11 pm by Ronda Muir
Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, South Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Hawaii  and Texas have issued disciplinary decisions holding that such relations during representation violate the rules of professional conduct. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 4:13 am by SHG
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U.S. 626, 651 (1985)). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Special Counsel Asks Supreme Court to Let Trump’s D.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio (1985) (same); Holloman v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:44 am by Eugene Volokh
"] Yesterday's decision by State Bar Court of California Judge Dennis Saab in In the Matter of Brown stemmed from the Office of Chief Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California (OCTC) charging a lawyer with, among other things, engaging in "moral turpitude" and violating state and federal law "by directing others to commit acts of violence. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:07 am by Russ Bensing
The biggest was the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
However, Supreme Court doctrine has developed a not-very-well-theorized distinction unknown to false advertising law generally: “inherently” misleading speech may simply be banned. [read post]