Search for: "Ohio Fourth District Court of Appeals" Results 81 - 100 of 681
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Bodyke, (2008-2502)   Ohio Courts of Appeals First District State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Alliance and Anadarko appealed to the Fourth District Court of Appeals, who reversed the trial court on all three arguments. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:03 am by MBettman
Since Justice Fischer sat on the appellate panel that heard this case, he has recused himself from this appeal, and Judge Marie Moraleja Hoover, Fourth District Court of Appeals, has been appointed to sit in his stead. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 5:41 am by adamengel
The Eighth District Court of Appeals has held that the Fourth Amendment requires suppression of evidence obtained from a defendant who fled from an otherwise unlawful search. suppressing the evidence because Baber ran from the arresting officer, giving the officer reasonable suspicion to search Baber and that The case is State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:37 am
The Fourth Amendment, after all, applies everywhere, not just in the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 10:23 am by Shawn R. Dominy
The prosecution appealed the judge’s decision to the Tenth District Court of Appeals. [read post]
While the Sixth Circuit largely affirmed the trial court decision, the appeals court vacated a punitive damages award of $67,650 because the district court gave improper jury instructions (House v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 2:49 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
On December 14, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:17 am by NCC Staff
In federal district court, the state of Ohio won the first legal challenge. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am by MBettman
The Second District Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction in a split decision, finding that the Supreme Court of Ohio’s Eighth Amendment analysis in In re C.P. was inapplicable to Blankenship because Blankenship was not a juvenile when he committed the sexual offense. [read post]
On March 1, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama declared the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) unconstitutional. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:17 pm by MBettman
On appeal to the Sixth District Court of Appeals, the court concluded that the arrest warrants were invalid and overruled Overton. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:24 am by Charles Rowland
App. 9th Dist, Summit County), the 9th District Court of Appeals rejected these arguments and upheld the enhanced punishments. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:56 pm by Jennifer R. Dixon
Another practice tip emerges from a May 16, 2012 opinion out of Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals. [read post]