Search for: "Oklahoma v Foster" Results 81 - 100 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The language explicitly limits its applicability to out‑of‑state placements in foster care or as a preliminary to a possible adoption (see Social Services Law '374Ba). [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 9:31 am
Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982), required that he be permitted to allocute with respect to the offense. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
Sips: http://www.ilrweb.com/viewILRPDF.asp filename=foundation_upcnederland_witnessdeclaration and amicus curiae brief of the ACLU, Public Citizen, Electronic Frontier Foundation, American Association of Law Libraries, and ACLU Foundation of Oklahoma, in Capitol v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:41 pm by Jeff Gamso
  They're really one.Heins takes her title from Felix Frankfurter's concurring opinion in Weiman v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:26 pm by Deborah Wald
The most notorious of these cases was Nancy S. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[10]  In enacting the ICWA, Congress declared its policy to be the protection ofthe best interests of Indian children and to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families by the establishment of minimal Federal standards for the removal of Indian children from their families and the placement of such children in foster or adoptive homes which will reflect the unique values of Indian culture, and by providing for assistance to Indian tribes in the operation of… [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
Oklahoma (1988) (in all "50 States," "no one under age 16 may purchase pornographic materials"); see also Pope v. [read post]