Search for: "Omar v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2019, 1:22 pm
In 2015, in Avneri v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council (2002) 1 AC 547, Omar v Westminster City Council (2008) HLR 36 (our report), Abed v City of Westminster (2011) EWCA Civ 1406 (our report), and Temur v Hackney LBC (2014) HLR 39 (our report) had all variously held that the facts relevant at review were those that pertained at the date of the review, not at the date of the original decision. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:50 pm
County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 8:10 am
In 2017, the Indian Supreme Court, in the case State Bank of India v Santosh Gupta, observed that even though Article 370 was labeled a “[t]emporary provision[]” and the Constituent Assembly had dissolved, the article “continue[s] to be in force” (¶12)—thus indicating it had attained permanent status. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am
In Part V of the census opinion, the chief justice found a way to provide a unique check here. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:21 pm
I like to develop and express my opinion through poll options, and I try to write each one fully committing to the state of mind one would need to make that choice. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:28 pm
But none of that makes Aspen an exclusive and extremely narrow path to the conclusion Judge Koh reached in FTC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
(Receiver of), 2017 SCC 63, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 855, invited a “flexible” application of the criteria stated in Canadian Dredge & Dock Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 7:58 am
., v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Omar Qureshi, Dan Tench and Cathryn Hopkins of CMS comment on the decision which was handed down on 15 May 2019 by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and others [2019] UKSC 22: On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment, deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”)… [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
In Lord Carnwath’s view, the provision in s.67(8) RIPA for a route of appeal to the Secretary of State did not add anything, given that that power had not been exercised and was ultimately an executive power, so did not support the argument that the courts should not have ultimate control [104]. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:07 pm
(Omar Ha-Redeye considered the two decisions on Slaw here.) [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am
Quinta Jurecic shared an International Criminal Court judgment in the appeal of Omar al-Bashir. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
” This appears to be the first endorsement by an appellate court of the approach taken by Mr Justice Mitting on this issue in the case of TLT v (1) The Secretary of State for the Home Department and (2) The Home Office [2016] EWHC 2217. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 9:17 am
Rachael Hanna recapped last week’s proceedings in the United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:34 am
Rachael Hanna summarized pre-sentencing hearings in the United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
Boumediene v. [read post]
