Search for: "Oregon v. Baker" Results 81 - 100 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm by Law Lady
Supreme Court -- The relevant clearly established federal law is standard for ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland, which requires a showing of “both deficient performance by counsel and prejudice” JEFF PREMO, SUPERINTENDENT, OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Petitioner v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm by law shucks
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
Hodge – whether Oregon v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:18 am by Ted Frank
Criticism of SG office brief in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 4:39 pm by Laura Orr
Humpty Dumpty in “Through the Looking Glass”), have the right to define words, assuming there is a need for them to do so.Court clarifies the definition of "tampers" as it is used in ORS 164.345(1):State of Oregon v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:51 am
A report by the receiver in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 12:47 am
  Also included are the contents of the TRIG with the results of her own self-administered TRIG grief profile, including: (i) her thoughts as she considered each statement, (ii) her perceptions about what her overall scores mean, (iii) her reactions to taking it, (iv) why she rated each statement as she did, and (v) criticism of the scoring as an accurate portrayal of a grief response. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
"o o April 1, 2009 decision hereo o SCOTUS docket hereo o SCOTUSwiki hereo o Noted here: Baker Hostetler; Colorado Employment Law Blog; ConstangyArgued - Awaiting DecisionAT&T v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 1:14 pm
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 278 Or. 305, 310-11; Baker v. [read post]