Search for: "P. v. Mays"
Results 81 - 100
of 19,721
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 8:08 am
Diaz v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm
LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:00 am
Despite its length, the Guidance conspicuously omits any reference to last fall’s landmark decision in FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:01 am
From Doe v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am
ReputationThe Court began by noting that although market share was a relevant factor, there was no requirement for a mark to be known by a specific percentage of the relevant public, nor for its reputation to cover all the territory concerned, so long as that reputation exists in a substantial part of that territory (QUARTODIMIGLIO QM, T-76/13 EU:T:2015:94).Furthermore, in order to establish whether a mark has a reputation, an overall assessment must be carried out of the evidence adduced by… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[27] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[28] According to a recent study, an estimated 93,094 illnesses are due to domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each year in the United… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:38 am
Bentley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:20 pm
³ See, D’Amore v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:34 am
P&C attorney William A. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
And yet, again, for Ecuador, the benefit may be worth the price. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
’ The judge may also have relied on the affidavit of the plaintiff’s epidemiological expert, Dr. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
P. 41(a)(2)…. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 7:30 am
On 17 April 2024, the Court of Appeal of the UPC handed down its decision concerning the language of proceedings in the (undoubtedly ground-breaking) case of Curio Bioscience v 10x Genomics. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
Before turning to that, it is worth mentioning one point on construction and the information which may (or may not) be taken into account when construing a claim. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm
Both the company and claimant were resident in Singapore and thus gateway (p) was satisfied. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:45 am
The question may seem trivial and one might be inclined to answer negatively. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
What followed did go well for Wells or the plaintiffs’ claims.[11] Judge Rosenstengel has written an opinion that may be the first careful judicial consideration of the basic requirements of systematic review. [read post]
