Search for: "P. v. Ross" Results 81 - 100 of 352
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without A Handle:  A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1]  This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  Sheriff Ross held that the defence of fair comment had been made out. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am by Peter Margulies
(See p. 54 of the report issued by the RAND Corporation supporting Carter’s decision.) [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:30 am by Cyrus Farivar
We sat in every session for the criminal trial of Silk Road mastermind Ross Ulbricht and took a similar approach to the API patents saga of Oracle v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
The Court then turns to whether Plaintiffs proved that those forms of injury are fairly traceable to Secretary Ross’s decision to add the citizenship question to the 2020 census and whether they are redressable by a favorable decision. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Caroline Lee
The Six P’s – Proper, Prior, Preparation, Prevents, Poor, Performance – are used when creating compelling factual and legal arguments. [read post]