Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Addendum II: The Justices’ Principal Concern at Oral Argument, and the Possibility of a Federalism-Based Resolution

15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman

This was the point of Justice Thomas’ very first question to Jason Murray, and it was a recurring theme throughout the argument. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

“The Case for Removing Trump From the Ballot Has a Fatal Originalist Flaw”

13 Feb 2024, 2:17 pm by Rick Hasen

Brook Thomas in Slate: Oral arguments in the Supreme Court for Donald Trump v. [read post]

Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/

[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"

8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh

Thomas any better? [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

[Josh Blackman] A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3

7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman

(p. 9.) [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

December 2023 Law Faculty Publications & News

7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am by fjhinojosa

Publications Charles P. [read post]

The Reporter - https://texastechlawlibrary.wordpress.com

:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II

6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude

" (P. 8). [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern

4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman

Fund v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”

3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman

In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

Weekly Roundup: January 26-February 1, 2024

2 Feb 2024, 6:30 am

Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment Posted by Maximilian Muhn, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, on Thursday, February 1, 2024 Tags: Consumer Behavior, ESG, Financial disclosures, Firm disclosures, Purchase decisions Tornetta v. [read post]

Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance - https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu

Weekly Roundup: January 26-February 1, 2024

2 Feb 2024, 6:30 am

Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment Posted by Maximilian Muhn, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, on Thursday, February 1, 2024 Tags: Consumer Behavior, ESG, Financial disclosures, Firm disclosures, Purchase decisions Tornetta v. [read post]

The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog - https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/

[Kurt Lash] Section Three and the "First Insurrection" … That Wasn't

29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash

Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

FAQs about the NetChoice Cases at the Supreme Court, Part 1

28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm by Daphne Keller

How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]

Stanford Center for Internet and Society Blogs - http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog

[Eugene Volokh] New Univ. of Texas Law Class on "Understanding Conservative Legal Thought"

9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh

Thomas v. [read post]